Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
GARRETT v. MENDEZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv05343
Plaintiff: ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Defendant: MIGUEL MENDEZ, ALLEN J., EDWARD GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rufus v. Social Security
as 13-6839
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant - Appellee: SOCIAL SECURITY, City of Camden, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Jessie Hill v. Estate of Sherman Bell, et al
as 11-3162
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jessie Hill
Defendant - Appellee: Estate of Sherman Bell, John M. Graves, Judge, Ouachita County, Daniel D. Ives, Judge/Prosecuting Attorney, Quachita County and others
HICKS v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv05659
Plaintiff: BRANDY TERRELL HICKS
Defendant: CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CAMDEN CITY POLICE OFFICER KEVIN PARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLLINS v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00651
Plaintiff: MARCUS COLLINS
Defendant: CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRAY v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02346
Plaintiff: KAREEM MCCRAY
Defendant: NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, RAWLS, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdus Salaam Malik v. Lewis Hannah, et al
as 09-4206
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee: ABDUS SALAAM MALIK
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF CAMDEN, individually and as the municipality of the Camden Police Department
Defendant - Appellant: LEWIS P. HANNAH
LAWSON v. WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2009cv01942
Petitioner: LEMEUL LAWSON
Respondent: WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF PAROLE, CITY OF CAMDEN, N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?