Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Cowan v. Allen et al
as 4:2010cv03409
Plaintiff:
James Cowan
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Ruth Naglich, Mitchem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. Thaler et al
as 4:2010cv02122
Plaintiff:
Catarino Sandoval
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Brad Livingston, Ben Raimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Destry Thomas v. Alfonso Castillo, et al
as 09-20884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESTRY E THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFONSO CASTILLO, Senior Warden, THOMAS D. HUNT, Administrative Segregastion Assistant Warden, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director of the State of Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Destry Thomas v. Alfonso Castillo, et al
as 09-20824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESTRY E THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFONSO CASTILLO, THOMAS D. HUNT, RICK THALER and others
Thomas v. Castillo et al
as 4:2009cv03871
Plaintiff:
Destry E Thomas
Defendant:
Alfonso Castillo, Thomas D Hunt and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zackery Hunt v. R. Rodriguez
as 09-17583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACKERY D. HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
R. RODRIGUEZ, Parole Agent
Thomas v. Castillo et al
as 4:2009cv03222
Defendant:
Christina Crain, Rick Thaler, Alfonso Castillo and others
Plaintiff:
Destry E Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewbre v. Gunnels et al
as 4:2009cv01363
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dewbre
Defendant:
Richard Gunnels, Thomas D Hunt, Allen R Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02838
Plaintiff:
Zackery D. Hunt
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, J Fitzgerald and M. Brown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunt v. The Board of Prison Terms et al
as 5:2008cv03591
Petitioner:
Zackery D. Hunt
Respondent:
The Board of Prison Terms and T. Roberson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
