Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 134
FRAZIER v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00087
Defendant: DANNY MITCHELL
Petitioner: TYRONE FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLLANDSWORTH v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00065
Petitioner: JEREMY HOLLANDSWORTH
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWEENEY v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00064
Petitioner: CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR.
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2022cv01061
Petitioner: MICHAEL DANNY JOHNSON
Respondent: INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Ind Dept of Corrs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff: Danny R Richards
Defendant: Ind Dept of Corrs, Taylor, Hinson and others
Not Classified By Court: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HILL et al
as 1:2021cv03107
Plaintiff: DANNY JOHNSON
Defendant: STEVEN HILL and BRIAN MARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00385
Plaintiff: DANNY FLORES
Defendant: T.J WATSON and WILLIAM E. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Mayes et al
as 3:2021cv00746
Plaintiff: Danny J Horton
Defendant: Mayes, William Hyatte and Porters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Mayes et al
as 1:2021cv00380
Plaintiff: Danny J Horton
Defendant: Mayes, William Hyatte and Porters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAINTIGNON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00334
Plaintiff: DANNY LEE SAINTIGNON, Jr.
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, RAJOLI, TAYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?