Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 31 - 40 of 765
Eakle v. Tibbs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff: David Eakle
Defendant: Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friend v. FBI
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff: John David Friend
Defendant: FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Friend v. Puckett
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff: John David Friend
Defendant: Brittany R. Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friend v. Staff We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00358
Plaintiff: John David Friend
Defendant: Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacLloyd v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00210
Petitioner: David Erike MacLloyd
Respondent: S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Linder v. United States
as 3:2022cv00139
Petitioner: David Linder
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGraw v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff: James Thomas McGraw
Defendant: McDowell County Commission, Sgt. Aaron Cantrell, Corporal Nicholas Culbertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buzzard v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00314
Plaintiff: David Buzzard
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Linder v. United States
as 5:2022cv00181
Petitioner: David Linder
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Monroe v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00057
Petitioner: David Christopher Monroe
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?