Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Park v. Morgan et al
as 1:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
Walter E. Park, III
Defendant:
Donald Morgan and Larry Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Phillips, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 15-3238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD PHILLIPS, RAYMOND TIBBETTS and ROBERT J. VAN HOOK
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Ohio, JOHN R. KASICH, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Ohio, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, in his official capacity as the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Carter, Jackie v. Green, James et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jackie Carter
Defendant:
James Green , Edward Wall, Micheal Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwayne Stoutamire v. Donald Morgan
as 15-3141
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWAYNE STOUTAMIRE
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD MORGAN, Warden
Phillips et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2014cv02730
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Phillips , Grady Brinkley , Raymond Tibbetts and others
Defendant:
Mike DeWine , John R Kasich , Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackie Carter v. Michael Meisner, et al
as 14-3575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MEISNER, JANEL NICKEL, Security Director, DONALD MORGAN, Administrative Captain and others
Ward v. Morgan et al
as 1:2014cv00872
Plaintiff:
Bryan M. Ward
Defendant:
Davis, Kevin Parker, Brian Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Noe v. Donald Morgan
as 14-4091
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS W. NOE
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD MORGAN, Warden
Durham v. Moore et al
as 1:2014cv00816
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Durham, Jr.
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Gary C Mohr, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2014cv00751
Plaintiff:
Harold Couch
Defendant:
Faisal Ahmed, Rosie Clagg, Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
