Cases 31 - 40 of 478
Foreman v. Attorney General et al
as 0:2023cv60502
Plaintiff:
Kareem Jabaar Foreman
Defendant:
Attorney General and Jack Tutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GOMEZ v. CAMPBELL et al
as 5:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
KAYLA CAMPBELL and FOREMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Green v. James Blair, et al
as 23-10797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK DWIGHT GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES BLAIR and JAMAL FOREMAN
(HC)Foreman v. Allen
as 2:2023cv00450
Petitioner:
Prentice Foreman
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Foreman v. Allen
as 1:2023cv00390
Petitioner:
Prentice Foreman
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foreman v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Renata Rochelle Foreman
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Joshua Wilburn, Stephanie Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Westley v. Brandeshawn Harris, et al
as 23-3177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WESTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BRANDESHAWN HARRIS, WARDEN LASHANN EPPINGER, MICHAEL BEEBE and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Foreman v. Attorney General et al
as 0:2023cv60400
Plaintiff:
Kareem Jabaar Foreman
Defendant:
Attorney General and Jack Tutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Foreman v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Renata Rochelle Foreman
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norris v. Tallulah Criminal Justice Complex et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kelly Nelson Norris
Defendant:
Tallulah Criminal Justice Complex, Major Foreman, Lt Flechter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
