Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Rutledge v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2009cv04228
Plaintiff:
Eugene Darrel Rutledge
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Alameda County Public Defender's Office, Diane Bellas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alex v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv01711
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Alex
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, -, Andrea Priori Meintel, Joseph P. Nish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Velentzas et al
as 1:2009cv01701
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Dimitrios Velentzas and Michael Grillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Moore v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, Co, et al
as 09-16273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO, CORPORATION, LANE LIMITED, ACCESS SECUREPAK and others
SMITH v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2009cv01658
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, GRILLO and JOYCE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Moore v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, Co, et al
as 09-15726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO, CORPORATION, LANE LIMITED, ACCESS SECUREPAK and others
Martinez v. Hoover, et al
as 2:2009cv00680
Plaintiff:
Archie A Martinez
Defendant:
G. Hoover, J. C. Blim, Olivas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martinez v. Hoover et al
as 3:2008cv04270
Plaintiff:
Archie A. Martinez
Defendant:
G. Hoover, J. C. Blim, Olivas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kirkwood v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
Sherron Kirkwood
Defendant:
Joseph Wilkinson, Grillo, J. Buono and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wesley Carroll v. SCI Waymart, et al
as 08-2489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY CARROLL, Blind Falsely Imprisoned Plaintiff
Defendant:
SCI WAYMART, DEPT OF CORR, BEARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
