Cases 31 - 40 of 267
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Aundrea Culclager, Benny Magnus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Razulu v. Seamster et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Shaka Rushdee Razulu
Defendant:
Lonnell Oquin Seamster, Sr, Tina M Evans, Brenda L Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility et al
as 4:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Hopkins
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Hill and Devore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Texas Health et al
as 4:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hill
Defendant:
Texas Health and Texas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Limuel Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. McCradic et al
as 2:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tyler Hill
Defendant:
Tyran McCradic, Clayton Jackson, Arkansas County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Does
as 4:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hill
Defendant:
Does, Dexter Payne and Asa Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutcherson v. Bowman et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Willie Hutcherson
Defendant:
Diane Bowman, Millie Hill and Shelly Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
