Cases 31 - 40 of 303
Hargrove v. Lablatt et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Petitioner:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent:
Sheriff Lablatt, Judge Oliver, Gov. Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Willis et al
as 1:2021cv05132
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Fani T. Willis, Sheriff Lablatt, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00174
Petitioner:
Solomon Hargrove
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hargrove v. Albuquerque School District et al
as 1:2021cv01118
Plaintiff:
Bennie Hargrove
Defendant:
Albuquerque School District, Scott Elder, Modesta Herrera-Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2021ct03349
Plaintiff:
Jacobi P. Walker and Cierra Grice
Defendant:
Shanticia Hawkins, Shirley Bennett, S. Fitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARGROVE et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv12678
Plaintiff:
PR MONIQUE HARGROVE and GERALD HARGROVE, DECEASED
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Don Pray, Michael Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Kemp et al
as 1:2021cv04487
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Governor Kemp, Judge Oliver, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Atlanta Luxury Motorcars et al
as 1:2021cv04309
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
Atlanta Luxury Motorcars and AtlantaLuxuryMotorcars.com/Marietta Ga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04308
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Judge Oliver and Sheriff Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bennett et al
as 5:2021ct03309
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Shirley Bennett, Barbra Watson Hargrove, Sgt. N. Remache and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
