Cases 31 - 40 of 176
Cincoski v. Lindsay
as 5:2022cv05042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Cincoski
Defendant:
Circuit Judge Mark Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gill v. Henry et al
as 6:2022cv06021
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, Nurse Ables, US Magistrate Judge Barry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Bourne et al
as 5:2022cv05013
Plaintiff:
Elvin Tyrone Joel Scott
Defendant:
District Judge Don Bourne, Circuit Judge James Dunnun, Correctional Officer Billy Hudsdeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Henry et al
as 6:2022cv06013
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, U.S. Judge Susan O. Hickey, U.S.Magistrate Judge Barry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balentine v. Watson et al
as 5:2022cv05008
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Attorney Todd Watson, Judge Rob Ratten and Deputy Prosecutor Randall Rudisill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Griffin et al
as 5:2021cv05212
Plaintiff:
Coby Townsend Hurst
Defendant:
Judge Chris M. Griffin and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dalton v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01035
Plaintiff:
Jackey Dalton
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
John Wright
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01023
Plaintiff:
Bobby Barbwire Law
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Askew v. Arnold et al
as 3:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
Darrell Askew
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
