Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Ridings v. Bethea et al
as 5:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Ridings
Defendant:
FNU Bethea, FNU Baker, FNU Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FORD et al v. MERCER COUNTY et al
as 3:2014cv00648
Plaintiff:
DARRYL FORD , DORSHANDA FREEMAN and KESHA MCFADDEN
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY, CHARLES ELLIS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS/SUPERVISORS JOHN DOE (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. NEW JERSEY DOC et al
as 1:2012cv05069
Plaintiff:
JERRY BROWN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DOC, JOHN DOE 1-10, JANE DOE 11-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiderlen v. Kane, et al.
as 1:2011cv01951
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Kiderlen
Defendant:
Pat Kane , John Doe #26 , Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bynum v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06228
Plaintiff:
Elexuses Bynum
Defendant:
City of New York , Martin F. Horn , Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. HUDSON COUNTY et al
as 2:2010cv03059
Plaintiff:
LUZ MENDOZA SANTIAGO
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY, HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, OSCAR AVILES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4 et al
as 1:2009cv08508
Plaintiff:
Devin Keitt
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe # 1, John/Jane Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Broom v. Kasich et al
as 2:2009cv00823
Plaintiff:
Romell Broom and Romell Broom
Defendant:
Ted Strickland, Terry Collins, Phil Kerns and others
Movant:
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLLING v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2008cv03183
Plaintiff:
STEVEN G. BOLLING
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, PETER T. ROSELLI, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
