Cases 31 - 39 of 39
EXUM v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
ERIC RICARDO EXUM
Defendant:
H. MARBERRY, J. BIGLEY, K. BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2009cv00549
Plaintiff:
Richard David Morrow
Defendant:
Connie S. Bisbee, Mary K. Baker, Adam Endel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lamon v. Director of the CDC et al
as 2:2008cv01762
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
Director of the CDC, G Stratton, S. Kerman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zarif Shabazz v. Pataki et al
as 1:2008cv05961
Plaintiff:
Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz
Defendant:
George E. Pataki, Glenn S. Goord, Anthony J. Annuci and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Matthews v. Baker
as 3:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Oliver Matthews, Jr
Defendant:
K Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baker et al v. Cooper et al
as 2:2007cv02394
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Baker and Louise K. Baker
Respondent:
Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and Curtis S. Person, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker et al v. Cooper et al
as 3:2007cv00621
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Baker and Louise K. Baker
Respondent:
Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and Curtis S. Person, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harless v. Campbell, et. al.
as 2:2007cv00600
Plaintiff:
Ben V. Harless
Defendant:
Roseanne Campbell, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of Community Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granger v. Campbell, et. al.
as 2:2007cv00602
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Granger
Defendant:
Roseanne Campbell, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of Community Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
