Cases 31 - 40 of 405
HARRIS v. DAYE et al
as 1:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
KATO HARRIS
Defendant:
DORA DAYE, K. SIMPSON, CHRISTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. SEIFERT et al
as 1:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
J.F. SEIFERT, T.J. KNAUB, THERESSA K. PRESSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02123
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Parks
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FULLARD v. ROBERTSON et al
as 1:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
REGINALD UNDERWOOD FULLARD
Defendant:
C. K. ROBERTSON, B. S. VALENTINE, B. VALENTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARTER v. ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
as 1:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
KEITH K. CARTER
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Perry et al
as 5:2022ct03191
Plaintiff:
James Alexander
Defendant:
Officer Perry, Captain Williams, ASW Sherrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mason et al
as 5:2022ct03147
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams
Defendant:
K. Mason and Beaufort County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. PUGH
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
RICHARD K. PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah-Malik v. Cathy et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik
Defendant:
Eddie Cathy, FNU Rogers, FNU Pursor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
