Cases 31 - 40 of 223
Bain v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Tamien Derrick Bain
Respondent:
K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bailey v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Sarah K. Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Miller v. Marshall et al
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Miller
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Medina Prue, Leslie Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Coakley et al
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Raul Ortiz
Defendant:
LT D. Coakley, CT M. Duff, LT D. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. Marshell (sic) et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
William K. Marshell (sic), III, Shelby Searls, L.T.C. Stove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haller v. Marshall et al
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Haller
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Curtis Dixon, Shawn Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stump et al v. Marshall et al
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jedadiah Stump and Adonnis Shephard
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, III, R. S. Mutter, Curtis Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osby v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Erick Allen Osby
Respondent:
K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gilmore v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00308
Petitioner:
Cynthia Gilmore
Respondent:
Warden, Warden Lovette, H.L. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clinton v. Chumley
as 5:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Sgt. S S Chumley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
