Cases 31 - 40 of 289
Lewis v. Hargraves
as 4:2022cv01230
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Jett Lewis
Defendant:
B Hargraves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedraza v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pedraza
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, G Musselwhite, Rob Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ball et al
as 4:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Todd Ball, James Gibson, Brandon C Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aaron v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Kameon V Aaron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Marshall Reed, Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Edwards et al
as 4:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Joshua Haynes
Defendant:
Edwards, Weatherly, Mark Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays and Larry Perkins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uren v. Dennis et al
as 3:2022cv03050
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Uren
Defendant:
Lt. Sebastian Dennis, Captain Jeff Lewis, Sgt. Tabitha Maze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Rechcigl
as 2:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Greg Rechcigl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis Brown
Defendant:
Pulaski County Circuit Court and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
