Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Walton v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv09220
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walton
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, Warden Pfister, David Lingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamby v. Lingle
as 3:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
William Davidson Hamby, Jr.
Defendant:
Kay Lingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Schloss, et al v. Forrest J. Ashby, et al
as 12-2971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY SCHLOSS, WALTER PEGUES, DON J. EVANS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FOREST ASHBY, ALFREDA KIBBY, LARRY J. PHILLIPS and others
Hall v. Prentice et al
as 1:2012cv01221
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
Susan Prentice, Andre Tilder, Kohlmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Hicks et al
as 1:2012cv01107
Plaintiff:
Robert . Moore
Defendant:
Bryce W Hicks, Scott Hill, David A Lingle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett et al v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2012cv03095
Plaintiff:
Donnie Barrett, Michael Halbrook, Kenneth Seidler and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services, Forrest Ashby, Reggy Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiderlen v. USA
as 4:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Steven Duane Kiderlen
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitmore v. Fish et al
as 1:2012cv01028
Plaintiff:
Gary Whitmore
Defendant:
D J Fish, Shel Phone Plaskett, Angelica Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. IDOC et al
as 1:2011cv01468
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
IDOC, Paula Rich, Michelle R Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Nodine et al
as 1:2011cv01455
Plaintiff:
Frederick Harris
Defendant:
Tracy Nodine, Brien Smeltz, Jason Brockett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
