Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Howard v. Kraus et al
as 2:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Fitzgerald Howard
Defendant:
C. Kraus, D. Snider, M. H. Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohea v. Patzloff et al
as 3:2010cv00437
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
Dina M Patzloff, A Arias, J Jimenez, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Cole et al
as 2:2009cv00771
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cole
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Corrections, Warden John Doe, S.M Leahey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Felker et al
as 2:2009cv02486
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
Thomas Felker, M. D. McDonald, T. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Gregory Miller
Defendant:
A. L. Johnson, S. Porter, Colonel Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devin Spady, et al v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 09-2933
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEVIN X. SPADY, JOSEPH LOURENSAU, EVOL YOUNG and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, JOHN SCHAFFER, DAVID WAKEFIELD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thomason v. Pacillas et al
as 2:2008cv02599
Plaintiff:
Joseph Steven Thomason
Defendant:
R Pacillas, M H Casey and M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Manriquez v. Tilton et al
as 3:2008cv02427
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demerson v. Woodford et al
as 1:2008cv00144
Plaintiff:
Edward Demerson
Defendant:
Jeanne S. Woodford, L. Polk, J. Ahlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
