Cases 31 - 40 of 316
BOYD v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REHABILITATION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and LT. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. USA
as 1:2022cv01105
Petitioner:
MARQUES ODELL LONG
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Boyd v. Riverbend Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv04806
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Riverbend Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Riverbend Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv04762
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Riverbend Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Riverbend Rehabilitation Fac
as 1:2022cv04746
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Rivrbend Rehabilitation Fac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. City of La Marque Police Department et al Example:
as 4:2022cv04149
Plaintiff:
Albert Perry
Defendant:
City of La Marque Police Department and Galveston County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. City of La Marque Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Albert Perry
Defendant:
City of La Marque Police Department and Galveston County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. RiverBend Rehabilitation Facility et al
as 1:2022cv04702
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
RiverBend Rehabilitation Facility, Warden Reeves and Every Employee at RiverBend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
