Cases 31 - 40 of 1,088
Chatmon v. Faulkner County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Rolandis Chatmon
Defendant:
Faulkner County, Arkansas, Circuit Court of Faulkner County, Arkansas, Michael Maggio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, WellPath, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jenkins v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Jenkins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Gleenover Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Dunham et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Douglass Scott Reeves
Defendant:
James Dunham, Does Donna, Nurse Aid; David, Nurse; Pope County Detention Center and Michael Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shane Michael Brown
Defendant:
Doe and C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Finnegan v. Leopard
as 3:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michael Finnegan
Defendant:
Jailer Keith Leopard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Michael M Miller
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dennison v. Counce et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
James Dennison
Defendant:
B J Counce, Gunnur Wilson, Jeremy Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
