Cases 31 - 40 of 1,341
Cannon v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02053
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Cannon
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spates v. Ishee
as 5:2024ct03056
Plaintiff:
Andre Michael Spates
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant:
SHERIFF CLARENCE F. BIRKHEAD, OFC. GLASSCOCK, WELLPATH, LLC d/b/a/ CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 5:2024ct03052
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office and Michael Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Townes v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2024ct03044
Plaintiff:
Michael Townes
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Lieutenant Eastwood and Officer Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Duncan et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Michael D. Duncan, Heather S. Warren, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MYERS v. BRATWAITHE et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
JARMAL LAMAR MYERS
Defendant:
STEPHANIE BRATWAITHE, PHILLIP TOLMAN, MICHAEL L. SWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HONEA v. HOGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. HONEA
Defendant:
ALLEGRA HOGAN, MICHAEL AMEZQUITA, MIKE WIZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department
as 5:2024ct03029
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Windsor Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
