Cases 31 - 40 of 236
Radford v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, B Johnson, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terrence Burks, Cobbs, Newburn and others
Defendant:
Lewis, Donzell Lewis, Matthew Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Potts et al
as 4:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
Antwan Matthews
Defendant:
Susan Potts, Barbra Parnell and Drew County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Gober et al
as 4:2022cv01116
Plaintiff:
Antwan Matthews
Defendant:
Mark Gober, Susan Potts, Erica Rochell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Gober et al
as 4:2022cv01001
Plaintiff:
Antwan Matthews
Defendant:
Mark Gober and Susan Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00947
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Elliott
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orasco v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Matthew Louis Orasco
Defendant:
USA, Doe and John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Roberts v. Staley et al
as 4:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Matthew Roberts
Defendant:
John Staley, Kristie Flud, Kevin McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Nathan Harold Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshal Dale Reed, Jennifer Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gauger v. Shultee et al
as 3:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
Matthew Edward Gauger
Defendant:
Nurse Debora H Shultee, Sabastion Dennis, Sheriff John Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
