Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamby v. McCallister et al
as 3:2018cv00865
Defendant:
Tony Parker, f/n/u Phillips and Cadie McCallister
Plaintiff:
William Hamby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallister v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv01140
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E Williams
Petitioner:
Donald McCallister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cain v. Stray et al
as 3:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cain
Defendant:
Russell Stray, Caidie McCallister, (f/n/u) Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. True et al
as 3:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Eric Teague
Defendant:
B. True, Eric Wilson, R. Baskerville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vargas Torres v. Harris et al
as 4:2017cv01977
Plaintiff:
Hector Vargas Torres
Defendant:
B. Harris, Wendle, R. Cischko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER et al v. PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM et al
as 2:2017cv04706
Plaintiff:
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER and KEMICO ANTONIO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. SUMMERS et al
as 3:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LLOYD MARTIN
Defendant:
SUMMERS, GAINES, MCCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Gutierrez
as 1:2017cv00083
Petitioner:
John McCallister Hood
Respondent:
FNU Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norris v. Stancliff et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Defendant:
C. Bolles, S. Brown, E. Bucher and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
