Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Ward v. Lavender et al
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Ward
Defendant:
Robert W. Lavender, Kevin Nolley, Jimmy LeCroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03089
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. McKie et al
as 6:2013cv02753
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B McKie, W Byars, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. McKie et al
as 6:2013cv01976
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B McKie, W Byars, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wirtz v. Oconee County Sheriffs Department, The et al
as 8:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Wirtz
Defendant:
Oconee County Sheriffs Department, The and David McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Temple v. Oconee County et al
as 3:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dennis Temple
Defendant:
Oconee County, James Singleton, Steve Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Temple v. Oconee County et al
as 6:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dennis Temple
Defendant:
Oconee County , James Singleton , Steve Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian Rochester v. Bull Street State Hospital
as 12-7476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER, a/k/a Julian Edward Rochester, on behalf of Melaney Johnston deceased victim
Defendant - Appellee:
BULL STREET STATE HOSPITAL, Its New Owners, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, TOWN OF SENECA and others
Rochester v. Bull Street Hospital et al
as 8:2011cv02180
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Bull Street State Hospital, State of South Carolina, Seneca, Town of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7038
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
