Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Todd v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00878
Defendant:
Thomas Bristol, D. Dewsnip, Garth Gulick and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Allen Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Abernathy et al
as 1:2016cv00135
Plaintiff:
Corey Delon Greene
Defendant:
Joseph Abernathy, FNU Gibbs, Randy S. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Donohue v. Vargo et al
as 2:2016cv00788
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Michael F. Gower, Dr. Gulick and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Patrick Donohue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Franklin, Jr. v. Gary Nusbaum, et al
as 16-3160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD FRANKLIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY NUSBAUM and ROBERT WHITE
Donald Franklin v. Gary Nusbaum, et al
as 16-3115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD FRANKLIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY NUSBAUM and ROBERT WHITE
Charlton v. Gulick et al
as 2:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shane Charlton
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Dr. Steven Shelton and Robert White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv02066
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ROBERT WHITE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv02065
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ROBERT WHITE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv02064
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ROBERT WHITE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farrar v. Peters et al
as 6:2015cv01935
Defendant:
Captain Bellman, G. Gulick, A. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Farrar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
