Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Easley Sr v. Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
Prince Derrick Easley Sr
Respondent:
Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villagrana v. Loving et al
as 3:2021cv00836
Plaintiff:
Abel Alejandro Villagrana
Defendant:
Kimisha Loving, Mr. (f/n/u) Madu, Mr. (f/n/u) Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFarland v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00519
Petitioner:
Troy Anthony McFarland, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Colwell v. Rogers et al
as 1:2021cv00010
Respondent:
Samuel Rogers and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Colwell, Sr,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cox v. Draper et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Philip Davis, Shane Stanton, Zachary Rich and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Anthony Cox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simonton v. USA
as 2:2020cv00212
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Fitzgerald Simonton, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee v. Corizen Mental Health Provider et al
as 1:2020cv01216
Plaintiff:
Jason Edward Lee, Sr.
Defendant:
Employees & Director of Mental Health Program, Corizen Mental Health Provider, TDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. State of TN Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01217
Defendant:
TDOC employees of Security & I.A., C/O, CPL'S, Sgt's, Lt's & CPts as well as I.A., State of TN Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Edward Lee, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeBow v. Kevin Genovese
as 3:2020cv00262
Petitioner:
Billy Gene DeBow, Sr.
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
