Cases 31 - 40 of 453
BESS v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
JAMAAR C. BESS
Defendant:
CENTURION, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, JOSEPH MCCUTCHEONS, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT TERRE HAUTE
as 1:2023cv01357
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE TAYLOR
Respondent:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Taebel v. Swift
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Taebel and Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Taylor Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
THOMAS, ERNEST, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENNINGER v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
JASON D. PENNINGER
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON, CENTURION HEALTH, BRITTANY WILDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Newkirk, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. SCHIEL et al
as 1:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR, SR.
Defendant:
ANDREW SCHIEL, BRANDON KIDWELL, ALEJANDRO LASTRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. TAYLOR
Defendant:
JAY HUDSON and ED ROACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNHART et al v. BRANHAM et al
as 4:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
STAN BARNHART and DONNA BARNHART
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, GREG DAY, TONY SEIDL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
