Cases 31 - 40 of 154
Morris v. Haines et al
as 3:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris
Defendant:
Major Haines, Montgomery County Jail, Captain J. Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LOWE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. LOWE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DUSTY RUSSELL, C. HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOGAN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
RASHAAD HOGAN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, COWRICK, GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RAJOLI et al
as 2:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
LESLIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
NAVEEN RAJOLI, SAMUEL BYRD, AMY WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOW v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 2:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SNOW
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYSON v. COAKLEY et al
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
MARK A. TYSON, JR.
Defendant:
C. COAKLEY, R VANFLEET, T. WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Templeton v. USA
as 22-3276
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE L. TEMPLETON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tyson v. Coakley et al
as 3:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Mark A Tyson, Jr
Defendant:
C Coakley, R Vanfleet, T Wellington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HADDEN v. HERSHEY et al
as 1:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE M HADDEN
Defendant:
RICHARD HERSHEY, JEFFREY LORMAN, ALISON AKKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRUCKER v. ENGLISH et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
CARL J. DRUCKER, II
Defendant:
ENGLISH, WELLINGTON, TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
