Cases 31 - 40 of 74
TRADER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv06737
Plaintiff:
TYRONE TRADER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TRADER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv05825
Plaintiff:
TYRONE TRADER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Trader v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2011cv04349
Petitioner:
Ossie Robert Trader
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Trader v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00465
Defendant:
Lewis Brown and Social Security Administration
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Colonel Lee Trader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trader v. Velez et al
as 3:2011cv00402
Defendant:
Lewis Brown and A. Velez
Plaintiff:
Colonel Lee Trader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trader v. Quentes et al
as 3:2011cv00296
Defendant:
Medical Director Ms. Quentes and Dr. Sheri S. Talley
Plaintiff:
Colonel Lee Trader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merillo v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00333
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, James Scarborough and others
Plaintiff:
Carlo Merillo, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRADER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2011cv01757
Petitioner:
OSSIE ROBERT TRADER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, KAREN L. GRIGSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
