Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Ricky Salazar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 15-6346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY SALAZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., BOP Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Anthony Robles-Telas v. Warden Terry O'Brien
as 14-7056
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY ROBLES-TELAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TERRY O'BRIEN
James Hamilton v. Cyndi Prudden, et al
as 14-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James H. Hamilton
Defendant - Appellee:
Cyndi Prudden, Deputy Director, Steve Larkins, Deputy Director, Warden Larry Denney and others
Joseph Cherry, II v. Terry O'Brien
as 13-7161
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. CHERRY, II
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TERRY A. O'BRIEN
Respondent:
USP HAZELTON
James Hamilton v. Cyndi Prudden, et al
as 12-2740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James H. Hamilton
Defendant - Appellee:
Cyndi Prudden, Deputy Director, Steve Larkins, Deputy Director, Warden Larry Denney and others
Gorbey v. Warden Terry Billingsley et al
as 1:2012cv03140
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden Terry Billingsley, Regional Director Norwood and Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Reginald M Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv02722
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Chief Deputy Warden John Doe, Chief Deputy Warden John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald M Williams
Gregory Ott v. Terri Gonzalez et al
as 2:2011cv04958
Respondent:
Matthew Cate, Matthew Cate, D Eugler and others
Petitioner:
Gregory Ott
Gregory Joseph Ott v. Terri Gonzalez
as 2:2011cv04225
Respondent:
Warden Terri Gonzalez
Petitioner:
Gregory Joseph Ott
Juan Francisco Perez v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2011cv03510
Respondent:
County of Los Angeles, Superior Court of California and Warden Terry
Petitioner:
Juan Francisco Perez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
