Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Ohlendorf v. Hoeh et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Thomas L. Hoeh, William L. Syler, Michael J. Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Bryan Ohlendorf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Gorham, et al
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Bryan Gorham, Jason Lewis, Alonna Wigfall and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nicholas Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Schmitt.
as 4:2019cv00065
Petitioner:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent:
David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skibo v. Morriss et al
as 2:2019cv04014
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Skibo
Defendant:
M Nazu, Bryan Skiles, Kelly Morriss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Schmitt
as 4:2018cv01665
Petitioner:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent:
David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson v. Schmit
as 4:2018cv00561
Petitioner:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent:
David Schmit and David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2018cv00313
Plaintiff:
Antwuan Allen
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Bryan Barton and Adam Garibay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Fulton State Hospital et al
as 4:2018cv00247
Defendant:
Southeast Mental Health Center and Fulton State Hospital
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Fulton State Hospital et al
as 4:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Stephen David Hawke, Fulton State Hospital and Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2017cv02891
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Bryan McGlynn, Thomas Mayer, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
