Cases 41 - 50 of 984
Woods (ID 77647) v. Crow et al
as 5:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
Kishen Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Sam Crow, Rachel Pickering and Kroy Koul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guyton v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tyreese Guyton
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail, Russ Olmstead, Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Bailey et al
as 3:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Antwan Walker
Defendant:
Sean Bailey, Carey L. Randall, James R. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Luke Irving
Defendant:
John Doe, Postmaster General of U.S.A, Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Crow et al
as 5:2023cv00270
Petitioner:
Deveyon Edreace Williams
Respondent:
Scott Crow and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Mr. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Walker
Defendant:
Mr. Nines, Mr. Stotler, Mr. Gillium and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Crow
as 23-40178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregorio Garcia, III
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Crow, I. Wysocki and G. Flores
Davis v. Crow et al
as 5:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Antoine Davis
Defendant:
Director DOC Scott Crow, GEO Group Inc, Amber Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 5:2023ct03070
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
Officer Roach, Superintendent Albright, Superintendent Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Charlie L Hardin
Defendant:
FNU Roach, FNU Albright, FNU Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
