Cases 41 - 50 of 2,168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06610
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Antwone Stokes v. Los Angeles Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2024cv06684
Defendant:
Redd, Nam, Los Angeles Sheriff Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Antwone Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mendez-Mendoza v. FCI-Victorville One
as 4:2024cv00700
Respondent:
FCI-Victorville One
Petitioner:
Alonso Mendez-Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mendoza v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv22952
Petitioner:
Michael Mendoza
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22917
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzales v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv01350
Defendant:
P. Paez, Jr., H. Djeda, J. Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Pedrito Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kali-Ma v. Gender Dysphoria Consultation Committee et al
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Najmaa-bin Sakinah S. bin-Sard-Khadijah, Kelly Allemandi, Cea G. Mai and others
Defendant:
Dale Lowe, Scott Ceresini, Sgt. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
