Cases 41 - 50 of 789
Spiker v. Anders et al
as 4:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Spiker
Defendant:
Scott Anders, Unknown Hayward, Mr. Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Stamps et al
as 2:2023cv04046
Plaintiff:
Curtis Stewart
Defendant:
Ruanne Stamps, Dana Meyer, Philip E Tippen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Buckner et al
as 6:2023cv03002
Plaintiff:
James R Thompson
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Katherine Barton, Dr. Ashok Chada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shivers v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv01365
Plaintiff:
Leo Ray Shivers
Defendant:
Cheryl Young and E. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windeknecht v. Hacker
as 4:2022cv01325
Petitioner:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burdge v. USA
as 3:2022cv05096
Petitioner:
Mark E Burdge
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Owens v. USA
as 4:2022cv00803
Petitioner:
Mitchell E Owens
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sims v. Falkenrath
as 4:2022cv00721
Petitioner:
Zeno E. Sims
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lam III v. Finn et al
as 4:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
James Lam III and James Lam, III
Defendant:
Det. Sgt. Ralph E. Finn, Ofc. Greg Palovick, Officer Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shivers v. Washington County, City of Potosi, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv01059
Plaintiff:
Leo Ray Shivers
Defendant:
Washington County, City of Potosi, Missouri, Deputy Kevin Snow and Joshua E. Hedgecorth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
