Cases 41 - 50 of 931
Thompson v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03291
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Warren
as 5:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Heather Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PRICE v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PRICE
Defendant:
D.C. ROBINSON, CYNTHIA B. KENNEY, DUSTIN YUENGLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00803
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Robinson et al
as 5:2023ct03262
Plaintiff:
James E. Price
Defendant:
D.C. Robinson, Cynthia B. Kenney, Dustin Yuengling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Divine v. Buchholtz et al
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Versa Divine and Marcus Devan Hunter
Defendant:
Peter R. Buchholtz, Kimberly D. Grande, Harold Reep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES and RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
EDDIE BUFFALOE, SECRETARY EDDIE BUFFALOE, SEC TODD ISHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023ct03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Wagner et al
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Wagner, FNU Smith, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
