Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 232
ALI v. UNITED STATES CITIZENS et al
as 2:2023cv00300
Plaintiff: HASAN ALI and RONNIE JACKSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENS, T. RULE, S. KALLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FLETCHER v. RULE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff: ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant: T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CAVERL v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00287
Plaintiff: HOWARD JORDAN CAVERL
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HOLLEY v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00288
Petitioner: LAWRENCE HOLLEY
Respondent: T. RULE and S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BONNER v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00276
Petitioner: LEE A. BONNER
Respondent: RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RENDELMAN v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00277
Petitioner: SCOTT L. RENDELMAN
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MUHAMMAD v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00273
Petitioner: RAHMAN MUHAMMAD
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee: SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, WARDEN/CAPTAIN NICK FISHER, LIEUTENANT ADAMS and others
BOLDING v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00209
Petitioner: AMONTA A. BOLDING
Respondent: RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PERKINS v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Petitioner: ERNIE PERKINS
Respondent: S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?