Cases 41 - 50 of 510
Andrews v. Does
as 4:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
James Lee Andrews
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Windham
as 4:2022cv04039
Plaintiff:
Brion Day Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Nevada County Jail, Andrew Windham, Debra Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpe v. Higdon et al
as 5:2022cv05073
Plaintiff:
Germane Andre Sharpe
Defendant:
Andrew Higdon and John Threet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. Gober et al
as 4:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Andrew Potter
Defendant:
Mark Gober and Susan Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serverance v. Higgins
as 4:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew Serverance and Scott Andrew Severance
Defendant:
Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pitts v. Byrnes et al
as 5:2022cv05039
Plaintiff:
Cora Lee Pitts
Defendant:
Officer Andrew Byrnes, Officer Phillip Crosby, Officer Page Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Michael McCormack
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reid, Jeremy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Does, Brandon Johnson, Bryant Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitson v. Hollis et al
as 3:2022cv03007
Plaintiff:
Penny Juanita Whitson
Defendant:
Corporal Andrew Hollis, Jane Doe Jailer and John Doe Jailer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Mitcham et al
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Price
Defendant:
Captain Richard Mitcham, Lt. Billy Perry and Officer Demitri Walka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
