Cases 41 - 50 of 67,868
Harris v. Ford
as 2:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Rene G. Harris
Defendant:
Attorney General Aaron Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Huff v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11816
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE HUFF
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Allan Schubert v. Kenneth Adebonojo
as 24-5148
Plaintiff:
Allan D. Schubert
Defendant:
Kenneth A. Adebonojo, Assistant United States Attorney
Jamal Ali v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2000
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ALI
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Williams v. Burleson County
as 24-50430
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Burleson County Sheriff, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
(PC) Bonilla v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office
as 2:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Alameda County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11812
Petitioner:
JUSTIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
BUTLER v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2024cv06549
Petitioner:
AHMAR BUTLER
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
