Cases 41 - 50 of 135
SYKES v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRYANT L. SYKES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and NUMI CARDHOLDER SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STONE
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, M. BRYANT, TIM GREATHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
John Galipeau, K Watts, Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. LIEDTK et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
LIEDTK, WEXFORD LLC/CENTURION, REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESLICK v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv02415
Plaintiff:
RYAN LEE ESLICK
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, WILLIAM WILSON, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2022cv02244
Plaintiff:
KEITH LEE BRYANT
Defendant:
ANDREA FRANKLIN, CONSTANCE SCHMITT, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
TYRUS BRYANT
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, SMITH, SIMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01663
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHRIS ERTEL, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
RA'MAR DANIELS
Defendant:
T. SOLOMON, J. D. BALLENGER, C. WARGNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
