Cases 41 - 50 of 134
(PC) Edwards v. Lamas et al
as 1:2019cv01300
Defendant:
M. Vivero, T. Hernandez, J. C. Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard A. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abel Eduardo Casillas v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2019cv06381
Petitioner:
ABEL EDUARDO CASILLAS
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunn v. Doctor Casillas, M.D. et al
as 4:2019cv02055
Defendant:
LVN Ms. Lenning, Doctor Kobber, M.D., Doctor Casillas, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Jacque Maurice Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casillas v. Salazar et al
as 5:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Casillas
Defendant:
State of Texas, Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Javier Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASILLAS-PRIETO v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2019cv00765
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO CASILLAS-PRIETO
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and FANNIN COUNTY TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Casillas-Prieto v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2019cv00148
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Casillas-Prieto
Defendant:
Fannin County Texas, United States Marshal Service and The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
(PC) Harbor v. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00384
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, C. Chamberlin and others
Plaintiff:
Travyon C. Harbor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casillas v. Salazar et al
as 5:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Javier Salazar and Bexar County Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Casillas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casillas v. USA
as 1:2018cv00313
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Adan Casillas
Material Witne:
Karl Crawford Hightower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(PC) Leonard v. Casillas et al
as 2:2018cv02004
Defendant:
A. Shahid, P. Foster and G. Casillas
Plaintiff:
Frederick E. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
