Cases 41 - 50 of 86
BURNETT v. NEAL et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
DEBBIE ABRAM, PAM BANE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERKINS v JORDAN ET AL
as 1:2017cv03507
Defendant:
DAN GORDON and DAVID JORDAN
Plaintiff:
LANCE PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00458
Petitioner:
DAN E PETERSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cope v. Wilcher et al
as 3:2017cv00693
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Cope
Defendant:
Sgt John Wilcher and Cpl Dan Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v Jordan et al
as 3:2017cv00675
Plaintiff:
Lance Perkins
Defendant:
David Jordan and Dan Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WINEMILLER v. ZODECKY
as 1:2017cv01825
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JAMES WINEMILLER
Respondent:
DAN ZODECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WINEMILLER v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv01826
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JAMES WINEMILLER
Respondent:
DAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00400
Petitioner:
Dan E Peterson
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL v. BEDWELL, et al
as 1:2017cv00173
Defendant:
JENNIFER ADAMS, DAVID BEDWELL, LEE HOEFLING and others
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONRATH v. UNITY HEALTHCARE LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Defendant:
JOHN BAUMAN, JASON BURGETT, DAN DALUGA and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 FMLA: Leave Requirements
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
