Cases 41 - 50 of 821
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Van Reil et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
David Mar' Kel Key
Defendant:
Lt. Van Reil, Deputy Creech, Deputy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinquefield v. Warden, Stanton Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00893
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Sinquefield
Defendant:
Warden, Stanton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alverson v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Alverson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Jefferson S. Dunn, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Guthery
as 2:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
David Hicks
Defendant:
J Guthery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. The United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Roberson
Defendant:
The United States of America and David Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Jordan Powell, Jeremy Herd, Keith Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. Carr et al
as 7:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Colvin
Defendant:
Greg Carr, David Lance Bailey, Jack Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. The United States of America et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Ronald Parker Little
Defendant:
The United States of America and David Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
