Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Glenn v. Wilson et al
as 3:2014cv00521
Plaintiff:
Dolen Glenn
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
William Wilson, Don McBride and Indiana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADFORD v. BROWN
as 2:2013cv00410
Petitioner:
GLENN PATRICK BRADFORD
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GLENN v. CARAWAY
as 2:2013cv00167
Respondent:
CARAWAY
Petitioner:
KEITH EDWARD GLENN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GLENN v. CARAWAY
as 2:2013cv00101
Respondent:
CARAWAY
Petitioner:
KEITH EDWARD GLENN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ACON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
GLENN DALE ACON, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ODOM v. WYNN et al
as 1:2013cv00171
Defendant:
LESLIE A. HOLTON, MEDICAL RECORDS STAFF, STATE OF IN D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cooper v. Moldenhour et al
as 3:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Glenn Cooper
Defendant:
Mike Moldenhour, Scott Bell and Steven Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODOM v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv00251
Defendant:
JOHN DALLAS, FLINER, KIM GREY and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
GLENN ACON
Defendant:
MS. S. BEIGHLEY, H. G. CHURCH, KIMBERLY KLINK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ODOM v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv00099
Defendant:
JOHN DALLAS, NURSE FLINER, KIM GREY and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
