Cases 41 - 50 of 2,330
Walls v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50011
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
N.P. Mershon, Nurse Hayes, Ms. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Carpentar et al
as 4:2024cv10014
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
S. Carpentar and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Holbrook v. Hurlbert et al
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dwayne Holbrook
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, Charles Hurlbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Oaks et al
as 4:2023cv10119
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra, Talika Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyrone Scott v. Wayne Holdon, Jr., et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Scott
Defendant:
Wayne Holdon, Jr., DEA, Officer, Miller County Detention Center, Rick Dodd, Retired DEA, Wayne Holding Co. and others
Hayes, Lloyd v. Stoner et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hayes and Lloyd D. Hayes
Defendant:
Stoner, Heidi, Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney v. Linares
as 4:2024cv10012
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Joseph Linares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Lochrie et al
as 5:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Trimard C. Campbell
Defendant:
FNU Lochrie, Deputy FNU Reid, FNU Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Paul Alexander
as 24-6032
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAUL ALEXANDER, a/k/a David Paul Hayes, a/k/a Shorty
Smith v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Chaplain R. Adams, Lt. R. Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
