Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Albritton v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Jamel Maurice-CaSaun Albritton
Defendant:
Pam Smith, Warren Hercules and ConMed Healthcare Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAWNER v. BUSS
as 4:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
CAED BRAWNER
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, H HERCULE and SALVADOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DYSON v. SEXTON et al
as 5:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
JOHN LESLIE DYSON
Defendant:
P SEXTON, K AKE and H HERCULE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. Hercules et al
as 1:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
Bernley Richard Orr
Defendant:
Dr. Hercules, Polokonis, Bonnye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyson v. Sexton et al
as 6:2011cv00228
Plaintiff:
John Leslie Dyson
Defendant:
P. Sexton, K. Ake and Dr. Hercule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Raymond, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs. P. Smith and W. Hercules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince Adekoya, II v. Holder
as 10-5167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prince A.Z.K. Adekoya, II
Defendant:
N. Gritsadanuruk, RN/ LCDR, USPHS/DIHS, C. Chong, RPH (Chief Pharmacist) USPHS/DIHS, V. Thompson, CRNP, (Nurse Practitioner), USPHS/DIHS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, John O. Morton, Secretary of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Rohaji Dale v. Lance Forsythe
as 10-7294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROHAJI D. DALE
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCE P. FORSYTHE, Superintendant, DOCTOR OFOGH, Doctor, GENE JOHNSON, Director of Prisons and others
Marvin Lee v. John Hercule
as 10-6823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN CARL LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE HERCULES, Doctor, JANE DOE TOPPAN, Nurse and JOHN NEWHART, Sheriff
Lee v. Hercules et al
as 2:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
Marvin Carl Lee
Defendant:
John Doe Hercules, Jane Doe Toppan and John Newhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
