Cases 41 - 50 of 4,801
Prichard v. Mullet et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Jim Mullet, James Richardson, Garvin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westberry v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Troy Westberry
Defendant:
Cert Smith, Private Contractor, Clue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pack v. Jim et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Darrion Pack
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jim, Jessica Kelly and Darrin Varnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v LeGrand et al
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Woods
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, J. Chandler, Jim Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magnotti v. Briddick et al
as 4:2024cv04026
Plaintiff:
Angalo C Magnotti
Defendant:
Thomas Briddick, George Leynard and Jim Andreoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. 79th District Court Jim Wells County
as 7:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Joseph Juventino Randall
Defendant:
79th District Court Jim Wells County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Randall v. 79th District Court Jim Wells County
as 2:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Joseph Juventino Randall
Defendant:
79th District Court Jim Wells County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richardson v. Peek et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Mark Richardson
Defendant:
Jim Peek, Timothy Vann and Cheyenne Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maes v. Pillen et al
as 8:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Mourad Karim Maes
Defendant:
Jim Pillen and Mike Hilgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coker v. Coker
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Todd Coker
Defendant:
Jim Coker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
