Cases 41 - 50 of 781
Searls v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Searls, Jr
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Keith Cooley and Unknown Correctional Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, John Bell Edwards, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Lonnie George Hines
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc and Susan Hutson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searls v. LeBlanc
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Searls, Jr.
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Sanchez Smith
Defendant:
Kieth Cooley, Bobby Young and James M LeBlance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Columbus Chris Williams
Respondent:
State of Louisiana, John Bell Edwards, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pittman v. Norris et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Defendant:
John Doe, Michelle Norris, Jon Bell Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ray Pittman, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Tim Hooper, Unknown Accountant Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bordelon et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
Donnie Bordelon, John Bel Edwards, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason v. LeBlanc
as 22-30773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clarence Joseph Jason
Defendant / Appellee:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
