Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Skipper v. Boyd, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00949
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Skipper, II
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Phyllis Billups, Larry Philyaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Frank et al
as 1:2012cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Dixon
Defendant:
Chris Frank and Rochelle Harvelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodyard v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00566
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Tony Patterson, Jesse Walter Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jemison v. Thomas et al
as 1:2012cv00557
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Tony Patterson, Jesse Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. McSwain-Holland et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv00687
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Davidson
Defendant:
Sharon McSwain-Holland, Jesse Youngblood and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skipper v. Lee County Sheriff Dept et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00648
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Skipper, II
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff Dept, Jay Jones, Major Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jemison v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00597
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Tony Patterson, Jesse Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Baldwin County et al
as 1:2012cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jesse W. Dixon
Defendant:
Baldwin County, Sheriff Mack, Major Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Bentley et al
as 1:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Dixon
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, State of Alabama and Baldwin County Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Huey Hoss Mack
as 1:2011cv00641
Petitioner:
Jesse Wayne Dixon
Respondent:
Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
