Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Dale (ID 91014) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2017cv03057
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Dale
Defendant:
James Heimgartner, (fnu) Bos, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson (ID 93050) v. Norwood
as 5:2016cv03247
Petitioner:
Elgin R. Robinson, Jr
Respondent:
Joe Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Dynan, et al
as 16-5290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Dynan, Assistant Warden, J. Hollingsworth, Warden, C. E. Samuels, Director, F-BOP and others
Stewart (ID 35253) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2016cv03189
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Stewart
Defendant:
Joe Norwood , James Heimgartner and Deane Donley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Dynan, et al
as 16-5092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Dynan, Assistant Warden, J. Hollingsworth, Warden, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, F-BOP and others
ROUDABUSH v. DYNAN et al
as 1:2015cv01682
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C. DYNAN, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C. E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. BUMB et al
as 3:2015cv06554
Petitioner:
JAMES ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
RENEE MARIE BUMB, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C.E. SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. Thomas et al
as 1:2012cv01537
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Collins
Respondent:
Jeff Thomas, Joe Norwood, David Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SAVAGE v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv04479
Plaintiff:
KABONI SAVAGE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Alexander v. USA, et al
as 12-55930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH S. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JESUS FERNANDEZ, MD, FCI Victorville 1, LILIA CASTILLO, P.A., VICTORIA MALINGKAS, P.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
