Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Gamble v. Quarterman et al
as 3:2010cv00443
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Gamble
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, NFN Cook and NFN Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Fernandez v. Glen Whorton, et al
as 09-17211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LYNN FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GLEN WHORTON, GLEN COX, BRUCE BANNISTER and others
Revels v. Bobbitt
as 9:2009cv00079
Petitioner:
Kevin Lynn Revels, .
Respondent:
Darrell Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Revels v. Faris et al
as 2:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Revels
Defendant:
Klaa Faris, Nathaniel Quaterman and Tommy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamble v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00567
Petitioner:
Kevin Lynn Gamble
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Revels v. Livingston et al
as 1:2008cv02656
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Revels
Defendant:
Brad (I) Livingston and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kevin Fernandez v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 08-17531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LYNN FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLEN WHORTON, GREG COX and others
Gamble v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv01368
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Gamble
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Future submissions by Kevin Lynn Revels will be returned unfiled and unopened in compliance with sanction order in Civil Action H-06-4118.
as 3:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Revels
Defendant:
J Zamulio, Josephine Sessions and UTMB-Galveston TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Fernandez v. State of Nevada, et al
as 08-15947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LYNN FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLEN WHORTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
