Cases 41 - 50 of 322
Johnson v. Marlboro County
as 5:2022cv03064
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Marlboro County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 3:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Warden and Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Navarro et al
as 2:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Travon Deautry Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Jacob Navarro, Christopher Leyda, Terrence R Carlstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2022cv03018
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 2:2022cv01466
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 4:2022cv00133
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2022cv02959
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2022cv02949
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Johnson v. Warden
as 1:2022cv03495
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Marlboro County Detention Center
as 1:2022cv00647
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Marlboro County Detention Center and Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
